[NSR] Winter-worthy motorcycle
Moderator: Modern Buddy Staff
- Syd
- Member
- Posts: 4686
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:41 am
- Location: Tempe
I found lots of them too. Too bad most of the wrecks are not Smart Cars, but other mini and micro cars in europe. You really gotta suspect the smartcarwreck.com site when it posts something like this:Wolfhound wrote:Syd, found them and more. Just search Smart Car Wrecks and you will see
a great many pix.
Accident at 5 miles per hour completely wrecks smart car.
- Attachments
-
- scw.jpg (21.84 KiB) Viewed 3084 times
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
- Syd
- Member
- Posts: 4686
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:41 am
- Location: Tempe
I really don't know why the falsly reported safety problems of the Smart Car bother me so much, but they just get under my skin. I looked at one, and would have been interested: good in-city transportation for two, blah,blah,blah. But it only got 40mpg. ? I had a car that got 40mpg 30 years ago. sheesh.
The majority is always sane - Nessus
-
- In Time Out
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:54 pm
The Smartcar and other "mini" type cars are pretty terrible. High priced and average fuel economy.
I drive a 2002 Saturn SL that got 40 mpg stock and now gets around 50 with a few modifications. And it is a full sized car. Also, MSRP was right around $10k when sold new. This, in my mind, makes me think that the Elio's claims could easily be possible.
I drive a 2002 Saturn SL that got 40 mpg stock and now gets around 50 with a few modifications. And it is a full sized car. Also, MSRP was right around $10k when sold new. This, in my mind, makes me think that the Elio's claims could easily be possible.
- Tazio
- Member
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:59 pm
- Location: Woodland Hills, CA
A 2wd Ural makes a great winter motorcycle. I love my Gear-Up and if I had to choose between my Buddy and the Ural it would be bye bye Buddy.
Also this is the last year you can get the WW2 style, carbs and camo paint. Next year it's FI, smog and computer junk, though I think they will still be all steel or Russian Iron as we call them.
Also this is the last year you can get the WW2 style, carbs and camo paint. Next year it's FI, smog and computer junk, though I think they will still be all steel or Russian Iron as we call them.
- Attachments
-
- Ural_Patrol.jpg (65.55 KiB) Viewed 3051 times
The Racer's Motto:
Broken bones heal,
Chicks dig the scars,
The pain is temporary,
but the glory is forever!
Broken bones heal,
Chicks dig the scars,
The pain is temporary,
but the glory is forever!
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
- Tazio
- Member
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:59 pm
- Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Wolfhound,
You can get hand shifters and selectors for reverse and 2wd. I'm a 76 year old 130 pound weakling with torn rotator cuffs and carpel tunnel in both hands and have no problems with the operation though it has been described as a primitive piece of Russian gym equipment.
They are tough as nails and easier to work on than a Buddy.
Here's a link to an older factory you-tube video showing the go anywhere capabilities. Machine guns and anti-tank weapons are not available from the factory for the civilian models though.
http://uralsidecars.com/ural-2wd-motorc ... r-show-tv/
You can get hand shifters and selectors for reverse and 2wd. I'm a 76 year old 130 pound weakling with torn rotator cuffs and carpel tunnel in both hands and have no problems with the operation though it has been described as a primitive piece of Russian gym equipment.
They are tough as nails and easier to work on than a Buddy.
Here's a link to an older factory you-tube video showing the go anywhere capabilities. Machine guns and anti-tank weapons are not available from the factory for the civilian models though.
http://uralsidecars.com/ural-2wd-motorc ... r-show-tv/
The Racer's Motto:
Broken bones heal,
Chicks dig the scars,
The pain is temporary,
but the glory is forever!
Broken bones heal,
Chicks dig the scars,
The pain is temporary,
but the glory is forever!
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
Tazio, it is a big leap from an Elio to a Ural. (OK, back on track )
I have got you by a year, 6'1" 185 lbs, but you make a good point concerning hand shifters. When the day comes I might look into that approach. We rarely see much snow here in NGA., and all my riding is done on county roads. Do go to Bryson City, NC once a year to ride. Down here the Ural has a bad name for problems but I understand that quality has improved greatly in the past 5 years. I am not much of a mechanic but I just like the looks of the Ural, also of the Elio(back on track again. )
I have got you by a year, 6'1" 185 lbs, but you make a good point concerning hand shifters. When the day comes I might look into that approach. We rarely see much snow here in NGA., and all my riding is done on county roads. Do go to Bryson City, NC once a year to ride. Down here the Ural has a bad name for problems but I understand that quality has improved greatly in the past 5 years. I am not much of a mechanic but I just like the looks of the Ural, also of the Elio(back on track again. )
- michelle_7728
- Member
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:16 am
- Location: Renton, WA
And ironically, if these articles (and the movie "Who killed the Electric Car?") are to be believed, GM quit making EV-1's (in fact forced leasee's to relinquish, then destroyed existing EV-1's), which got 140 miles per charge, in favor of making the Hummer.Robbie wrote:Kinda cool.....they have purchassed the G.M. assembly plant that was producing the Hummer H3......kind of ironic thinking fuel mileage extremes.
Evidently, funding is adequete....we'll see.......
Rob
What was the EV-1?
Hummer mentioned here
Past bikes: 08' Genuine Buddy 125, '07 Yamaha Majesty 400, '07 Piaggio MP3 250, '08 Piaggio MP3 500, '08 Aprilia Scarabeo 500
Current bikes: Two '09 Genuine Buddy 125's
Current bikes: Two '09 Genuine Buddy 125's
-
- Member
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 2:46 am
- Location: Desplaines Il.
The EV-1 (also known as Impact) was a test mule, no different than the Chrysler Turbine car was in the 60's
And, just like Chrysler, the units were only available for lease in specific markets.
Those that leased the units were well aware that there was no purchass option and the lease cost was subsidized by the corporation.
The operators were to and did provide operation information during the lease.
And, after the experiment ended, just like Chrysler did, the majority of the units were destroyed.....this so that there would be no need to provide parts support/ future potental recalls, etcetera.
A large part of the EV-1's tech has been utilized on the current (ha!) Volt.
G.M. did not 'Kill' the electric car.
Rob
And, just like Chrysler, the units were only available for lease in specific markets.
Those that leased the units were well aware that there was no purchass option and the lease cost was subsidized by the corporation.
The operators were to and did provide operation information during the lease.
And, after the experiment ended, just like Chrysler did, the majority of the units were destroyed.....this so that there would be no need to provide parts support/ future potental recalls, etcetera.
A large part of the EV-1's tech has been utilized on the current (ha!) Volt.
G.M. did not 'Kill' the electric car.
Rob
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
- Rob
- Member
- Posts: 1177
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:09 pm
- Location: Munster, IN (Chicago 'burb)
Harsh, but a sound business study. Again, while this vehicle doesn't do it for me, I understand the potential market desire for such a ride.charlie55 wrote:You guys might want to give this a read.....
http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/19/pau ... inancials/
Pretty harsh evaluation.....
Unfortunately, common business sense would tell you that this is an infeasible business model. While even a base version of the vehicle at a $7K price tag would be highly suspect, options and amenities, such an AC, just aren't going to happen.
Rob
"Sponges grow in the ocean. That just kills me. I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be if that didn't happen."
- Steven Wright
- Steven Wright
- ScootLemont
- Member
- Posts: 2526
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:20 pm
- Location: Lemont IL
- Contact:
<iframe width="640" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/D6p-CGTKpes?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
- neotrotsky
- Member
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:48 am
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
- Contact:
For a whim I "liked" them on facebook... but a bunch of disturbing trends arose:
-They keep touring like some rock band, but it seems they have only ONE car to show off. And, those who have actually sat in it (a very limited amount of people are actually allowed in it, so it seems) say that the ergonomics are pretty difficult at best.
-The pictures of their Louisiana plant keep showing machinery meant to make GM trucks, and not Elio cars. They keep posting these pictures of the plant proudly saying they are on their way, but the machinery by this point has been removed. Kind of gives a false impression, don't you think?
-The few times I've tried to comment on healthy speculation, and you're met with more attacks than someone who uses a Microsoft Surface at a Starbucks! Petty bickering, personal attacks and creepy IM's all result when you *dare* question the validity of the company... all from "fans" who have never even drove the thing!
They have yet to do the "proper" car promotion thing: Get Top Gear (US or UK) To mock/review it (which is always good press, no matter how horrible they make it out to be). They haven't got one in the hands of Jay Leno, which to many "car guys" is a big bit of publicity, and they have yet to actually produce models that can actually be driven. I have yet to see anyone actually DRIVE this thing that isn't an employee.
Frankly, it reeks of vaporware. I feel sorry for those people who are near-religious about this and have forked over cash
-They keep touring like some rock band, but it seems they have only ONE car to show off. And, those who have actually sat in it (a very limited amount of people are actually allowed in it, so it seems) say that the ergonomics are pretty difficult at best.
-The pictures of their Louisiana plant keep showing machinery meant to make GM trucks, and not Elio cars. They keep posting these pictures of the plant proudly saying they are on their way, but the machinery by this point has been removed. Kind of gives a false impression, don't you think?
-The few times I've tried to comment on healthy speculation, and you're met with more attacks than someone who uses a Microsoft Surface at a Starbucks! Petty bickering, personal attacks and creepy IM's all result when you *dare* question the validity of the company... all from "fans" who have never even drove the thing!
They have yet to do the "proper" car promotion thing: Get Top Gear (US or UK) To mock/review it (which is always good press, no matter how horrible they make it out to be). They haven't got one in the hands of Jay Leno, which to many "car guys" is a big bit of publicity, and they have yet to actually produce models that can actually be driven. I have yet to see anyone actually DRIVE this thing that isn't an employee.
Frankly, it reeks of vaporware. I feel sorry for those people who are near-religious about this and have forked over cash
"Earth" without Art is just "Eh"...
<a href="http://slowkidsscootergang.wordpress.com/">The Slow Kids Scooter Gang</a>
<a href="http://slowkidsscootergang.wordpress.com/">The Slow Kids Scooter Gang</a>
- michelle_7728
- Member
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:16 am
- Location: Renton, WA
I don't know...I would rather be optomistic about this. I really, really, REALLY want a viable alternative to scooting to work in inclement weather when my carpool buddy is not available. ...and alternative that will allow me to STILL use the carpool lane.
I really like riding to work, but let's face it, 45 minutes on the road with masses of humanity on the freeway is more risk than I want to take on on a regular basis. 45 minutes is when I can take the carpool lane. If I CAN'T take the carpool lane, we're talking a 1 1/2 to 2 hour one-way commute.
I went with a friend of mine and saw/sat in one Saturday. I really liked it. I was able to adjust the seat up (I'm 5'4") and it was a good fit. Right before me was a co-worker of mine and his wife that are interested in one. He's 6'5", and he was able to fit in there with room to spare....and she was able to sit behind him without feeling like a pretzel (she's 5'3", I think).
With the back seat folded down there's a good bit of space available (can you say "Costco run"? )
Three full size, wide tires and rims, easy to get at the back tire if needed, even a cupholder spot for the rear passenger. What more could you ask?
They plan to have 3 dealers in the Washington state area, one at least, in Seattle.
I went ahead and added myself to their "refundable" deposit list...so if it DOES come out, I'll be on the list right behind the people who put a non-refundable deposit down. I didn't put enough down to where I'd be devastated if I lost my money, but hey, it's made in America and will be supporting American workers, and it would get good gas mileage, and can be driven in comfort in rain, cold or heat.
I agree the marketing has been a bit unorthodox, but this is a start up...America was BUILT on start-ups. I'm all for giving these guys a chance. If they succeed, it will be awesome!
(The non-refundable bit is because I'm still working on my better half on this one....I think I have him mostly swayed... )
I really like riding to work, but let's face it, 45 minutes on the road with masses of humanity on the freeway is more risk than I want to take on on a regular basis. 45 minutes is when I can take the carpool lane. If I CAN'T take the carpool lane, we're talking a 1 1/2 to 2 hour one-way commute.
I went with a friend of mine and saw/sat in one Saturday. I really liked it. I was able to adjust the seat up (I'm 5'4") and it was a good fit. Right before me was a co-worker of mine and his wife that are interested in one. He's 6'5", and he was able to fit in there with room to spare....and she was able to sit behind him without feeling like a pretzel (she's 5'3", I think).
With the back seat folded down there's a good bit of space available (can you say "Costco run"? )
Three full size, wide tires and rims, easy to get at the back tire if needed, even a cupholder spot for the rear passenger. What more could you ask?
They plan to have 3 dealers in the Washington state area, one at least, in Seattle.
I went ahead and added myself to their "refundable" deposit list...so if it DOES come out, I'll be on the list right behind the people who put a non-refundable deposit down. I didn't put enough down to where I'd be devastated if I lost my money, but hey, it's made in America and will be supporting American workers, and it would get good gas mileage, and can be driven in comfort in rain, cold or heat.
I agree the marketing has been a bit unorthodox, but this is a start up...America was BUILT on start-ups. I'm all for giving these guys a chance. If they succeed, it will be awesome!
(The non-refundable bit is because I'm still working on my better half on this one....I think I have him mostly swayed... )
Past bikes: 08' Genuine Buddy 125, '07 Yamaha Majesty 400, '07 Piaggio MP3 250, '08 Piaggio MP3 500, '08 Aprilia Scarabeo 500
Current bikes: Two '09 Genuine Buddy 125's
Current bikes: Two '09 Genuine Buddy 125's
- CapnK
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 1:03 pm
- Location: Georgetown, SC
I'm definitely in with the "I'd like to see this in production" club, if they can do all they claim, or at least get very near it.
What I would hate to see them do is to pull a Microsoft and rush an untested "beta" version out of the factory which then falls short of their stated goals of reliability, economy, and low cost...
MS, with their near-monopolistic market penetration, can afford to foist onto the public their technologically inferior, security-issue laden, improperly tested software which comes nowhere near the feature set they used to initially sell it; see WinME, Vista, and to a degree Win8, in their OS line. They have the resources to deal with the backlash, to absorb the initial blow of bad publicity until they can Service Pack "improvements" (AKA: what *should have been* in the RTM) out to the public.
For Elio to do similar with the first iteration of this vehicle would mark them for death, despite the promise of the product they appear to be honestly attempting to produce, and that would be a real shame.
What I would hate to see them do is to pull a Microsoft and rush an untested "beta" version out of the factory which then falls short of their stated goals of reliability, economy, and low cost...
MS, with their near-monopolistic market penetration, can afford to foist onto the public their technologically inferior, security-issue laden, improperly tested software which comes nowhere near the feature set they used to initially sell it; see WinME, Vista, and to a degree Win8, in their OS line. They have the resources to deal with the backlash, to absorb the initial blow of bad publicity until they can Service Pack "improvements" (AKA: what *should have been* in the RTM) out to the public.
For Elio to do similar with the first iteration of this vehicle would mark them for death, despite the promise of the product they appear to be honestly attempting to produce, and that would be a real shame.
A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way. - M. Twain
- michelle_7728
- Member
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:16 am
- Location: Renton, WA
-
- In Time Out
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:54 pm
Here is another concept that looks interesting. Its $24k instead of $7k, but it looks pretty awesome.
http://litmotors.com/c1/
http://litmotors.com/c1/
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
Wiki the company, LIT Motors. Claim it is neither motorcycle or automobile.
It is obviously a motorcycle under all sate requirements. Claims 100 mph, range 200 mi, charge time 4-6 hours. Co. started in 2010, claims production starts in 2014,will accept pre orders --$7000.00 min pre pmt.
Sorry, sounds like ANOTHER Elio project.
It is obviously a motorcycle under all sate requirements. Claims 100 mph, range 200 mi, charge time 4-6 hours. Co. started in 2010, claims production starts in 2014,will accept pre orders --$7000.00 min pre pmt.
Sorry, sounds like ANOTHER Elio project.
I don't know how realistic it is, but judging the company based on what somebody wrote about it on Wikipedia is a bit unfair. I looked around on their web site, and they avoid calling it anything other than a "vehicle", but they say it requires a motorcycle license, and I didn't see any claim that it wasn't one.Wolfhound wrote:Wiki the company, LIT Motors. Claim it is neither motorcycle or automobile.
-
- Member
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:55 am
- Location: kansas city mo
I'd disagree with full size car. Too low to the ground for me. 40mpg lightly loaded is totally plausible but use the Ac and mileage takes a nasty hit. Now they do make owning a tdi vw look expensive. My parents get 29 mpg around town.walke2jd wrote:The Smartcar and other "mini" type cars are pretty terrible. High priced and average fuel economy.
I drive a 2002 Saturn SL that got 40 mpg stock and now gets around 50 with a few modifications. And it is a full sized car. Also, MSRP was right around $10k when sold new. This, in my mind, makes me think that the Elio's claims could easily be possible.
- neotrotsky
- Member
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:48 am
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
- Contact:
50mpg on a Saturn that, from the EPA, is barely listed above 30mpg? I smell BS. Besides, the average Saturn has as much plastic as a Smart car (They were pretty heavy in the polymer department). Don't get me wrong, Saturns are good cars. BUT, people love to ignore physics and the decidedly "average" Crash tests of cars like Saturn, Cavaliers, Neons and even Nissans in order to bash small cars because they're not miracle machines.lovemysan wrote:I'd disagree with full size car. Too low to the ground for me. 40mpg lightly loaded is totally plausible but use the Ac and mileage takes a nasty hit. Now they do make owning a tdi vw look expensive. My parents get 29 mpg around town.walke2jd wrote:The Smartcar and other "mini" type cars are pretty terrible. High priced and average fuel economy.
I drive a 2002 Saturn SL that got 40 mpg stock and now gets around 50 with a few modifications. And it is a full sized car. Also, MSRP was right around $10k when sold new. This, in my mind, makes me think that the Elio's claims could easily be possible.
I personally am a fan of the Smart, Fiat 500 and the like. Smaller cars=less material. Using less material and a smaller footprint in urban environments is always a good thing. No... it won't out run a mustang. Yes, it would be obliterated if an 18-wheeler hit it, but so would any family sedan.
If you want a dose of reality, check out this crash test vid of a "sturdy" 1950's large American sedan made of "Real" steel and a modern equivalent. Larger isn't better.
http://youtu.be/joMK1WZjP7g
Long story short: Facts don't matter to those who choose to ignore them. It's small, and some hate small cars. Perhaps it makes them feel less masculine. Perhaps they feel that unless it's a massive Cadillac they should get 100mpg and a free kitten. Either way, the fact is that the Smart and other small cars do A LOT for passenger safety with very little material to work with.
"Earth" without Art is just "Eh"...
<a href="http://slowkidsscootergang.wordpress.com/">The Slow Kids Scooter Gang</a>
<a href="http://slowkidsscootergang.wordpress.com/">The Slow Kids Scooter Gang</a>
- Syd
- Member
- Posts: 4686
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:41 am
- Location: Tempe
don't know why I continue to let this stuff bug me, but...CapnK wrote:What I would hate to see them do is to pull a Microsoft and rush an untested "beta" version out of the factory which then falls short of their stated goals of reliability, economy, and low cost...
MS, with their near-monopolistic market penetration, can afford to foist onto the public their technologically inferior, security-issue laden, improperly tested software which comes nowhere near the feature set they used to initially sell it; see WinME, Vista, and to a degree Win8, in their OS line. They have the resources to deal with the backlash, to absorb the initial blow of bad publicity until they can Service Pack "improvements" (AKA: what *should have been* in the RTM) out to the public.
iFanBoi much?
The majority is always sane - Nessus
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
- Dooglas
- Moderator
- Posts: 4368
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 2:17 am
- Location: Oregon City, OR
Well, I'd say you need to talk with Jim Petitti at Raceway Services. He developed several different models of a hand shifter for the Ural. This came out of his own polio and the need to ride motorcycles with hand controls. And nobody knows Urals better than Jim.Wolfhound wrote:I have a scooter /sidecar and have always wanted a Ural. However, neuropathy in my calves and feet makes shifting problematic.
http://www.racewayservicespaa.com/index.html
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
-
- Member
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:55 am
- Location: kansas city mo
Actually it's not bs. I've done over 7000 vacation miles(loaded) at 50mpg+. My main complaint with the sl is the ergonomics and the anemic 8v under the hood. A stock one driven normally will get 40-42 mpg on the highway. Polymer is what the panels are made not the structure. I really feel Saturn was a great attempt at making cars. The big letdown was the head cracking and oil burning. Msrp for my old sl sport was $9995 it was a great car for the money.neotrotsky wrote:50mpg on a Saturn that, from the EPA, is barely listed above 30mpg? I smell BS. Besides, the average Saturn has as much plastic as a Smart car (They were pretty heavy in the polymer department). Don't get me wrong, Saturns are good cars. BUT, people love to ignore physics and the decidedly "average" Crash tests of cars like Saturn, Cavaliers, Neons and even Nissans in order to bash small cars because they're not miracle machines.lovemysan wrote:I'd disagree with full size car. Too low to the ground for me. 40mpg lightly loaded is totally plausible but use the Ac and mileage takes a nasty hit. Now they do make owning a tdi vw look expensive. My parents get 29 mpg around town.walke2jd wrote:The Smartcar and other "mini" type cars are pretty terrible. High priced and average fuel economy.
I drive a 2002 Saturn SL that got 40 mpg stock and now gets around 50 with a few modifications. And it is a full sized car. Also, MSRP was right around $10k when sold new. This, in my mind, makes me think that the Elio's claims could easily be possible.
I personally am a fan of the Smart, Fiat 500 and the like. Smaller cars=less material. Using less material and a smaller footprint in urban environments is always a good thing. No... it won't out run a mustang. Yes, it would be obliterated if an 18-wheeler hit it, but so would any family sedan.
If you want a dose of reality, check out this crash test vid of a "sturdy" 1950's large American sedan made of "Real" steel and a modern equivalent. Larger isn't better.
http://youtu.be/joMK1WZjP7g
Long story short: Facts don't matter to those who choose to ignore them. It's small, and some hate small cars. Perhaps it makes them feel less masculine. Perhaps they feel that unless it's a massive Cadillac they should get 100mpg and a free kitten. Either way, the fact is that the Smart and other small cars do A LOT for passenger safety with very little material to work with.
- Lostmycage
- FAQ Moderator
- Posts: 4062
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:36 am
- Location: The Interwebz!
If they can produce the advertised product at the advertised price, my household would purchase at the absolute minimum 1 and most likely 2. I think this is an awesome product with HUGE potential.
I have no idea how that lines up with real world numbers.
I have no idea how that lines up with real world numbers.
Check out Scoot Richmond's new site: My awesome local shop.
- neotrotsky
- Member
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:48 am
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
- Contact:
Without proof... not buying it for a minute. My geo metro 3 cylinder with a 5 speed and single passenger got at best 52mpg. The math just isn't in favor of your storylovemysan wrote:Actually it's not bs. I've done over 7000 vacation miles(loaded) at 50mpg+. My main complaint with the sl is the ergonomics and the anemic 8v under the hood. A stock one driven normally will get 40-42 mpg on the highway. Polymer is what the panels are made not the structure. I really feel Saturn was a great attempt at making cars. The big letdown was the head cracking and oil burning. Msrp for my old sl sport was $9995 it was a great car for the money.neotrotsky wrote:50mpg on a Saturn that, from the EPA, is barely listed above 30mpg? I smell BS. Besides, the average Saturn has as much plastic as a Smart car (They were pretty heavy in the polymer department). Don't get me wrong, Saturns are good cars. BUT, people love to ignore physics and the decidedly "average" Crash tests of cars like Saturn, Cavaliers, Neons and even Nissans in order to bash small cars because they're not miracle machines.lovemysan wrote: I'd disagree with full size car. Too low to the ground for me. 40mpg lightly loaded is totally plausible but use the Ac and mileage takes a nasty hit. Now they do make owning a tdi vw look expensive. My parents get 29 mpg around town.
I personally am a fan of the Smart, Fiat 500 and the like. Smaller cars=less material. Using less material and a smaller footprint in urban environments is always a good thing. No... it won't out run a mustang. Yes, it would be obliterated if an 18-wheeler hit it, but so would any family sedan.
If you want a dose of reality, check out this crash test vid of a "sturdy" 1950's large American sedan made of "Real" steel and a modern equivalent. Larger isn't better.
http://youtu.be/joMK1WZjP7g
Long story short: Facts don't matter to those who choose to ignore them. It's small, and some hate small cars. Perhaps it makes them feel less masculine. Perhaps they feel that unless it's a massive Cadillac they should get 100mpg and a free kitten. Either way, the fact is that the Smart and other small cars do A LOT for passenger safety with very little material to work with.
"Earth" without Art is just "Eh"...
<a href="http://slowkidsscootergang.wordpress.com/">The Slow Kids Scooter Gang</a>
<a href="http://slowkidsscootergang.wordpress.com/">The Slow Kids Scooter Gang</a>
-
- Member
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:55 am
- Location: kansas city mo
http://www.gassavers.org/garage/viewgaslog/127
http://www.missourilife.com/life/meet-the-hypermilers/
That's me the second guy.
I drove the car another year after I quit logging mileage on gassavers, i moved over to ecomodders. My best tank was 62.*. There was a lot more in the car. I could have hit 70mpg with more effort and tweaking the aero mods. I spent about $100 modding the car not including the scan gauge. The car still runs the hai and grill block to this day. My parents average mid 40s on the highway. Their technique is terrible .
http://www.missourilife.com/life/meet-the-hypermilers/
That's me the second guy.
I drove the car another year after I quit logging mileage on gassavers, i moved over to ecomodders. My best tank was 62.*. There was a lot more in the car. I could have hit 70mpg with more effort and tweaking the aero mods. I spent about $100 modding the car not including the scan gauge. The car still runs the hai and grill block to this day. My parents average mid 40s on the highway. Their technique is terrible .
-
- In Time Out
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:54 pm
I think you misunderstand my issues with the "small cars". I would love to own a Scion iQ, Fiat 500, or one of the other small cars. But I think they fall really short where it counts. They aren't priced terribly, but to drive something that small, the payoff needs to be stellar MPG, which they just don't deliver.neotrotsky wrote:50mpg on a Saturn that, from the EPA, is barely listed above 30mpg? I smell BS. Besides, the average Saturn has as much plastic as a Smart car (They were pretty heavy in the polymer department). Don't get me wrong, Saturns are good cars. BUT, people love to ignore physics and the decidedly "average" Crash tests of cars like Saturn, Cavaliers, Neons and even Nissans in order to bash small cars because they're not miracle machines.
I personally am a fan of the Smart, Fiat 500 and the like. Smaller cars=less material. Using less material and a smaller footprint in urban environments is always a good thing. No... it won't out run a mustang. Yes, it would be obliterated if an 18-wheeler hit it, but so would any family sedan.
If you want a dose of reality, check out this crash test vid of a "sturdy" 1950's large American sedan made of "Real" steel and a modern equivalent. Larger isn't better.
http://youtu.be/joMK1WZjP7g
Long story short: Facts don't matter to those who choose to ignore them. It's small, and some hate small cars. Perhaps it makes them feel less masculine. Perhaps they feel that unless it's a massive Cadillac they should get 100mpg and a free kitten. Either way, the fact is that the Smart and other small cars do A LOT for passenger safety with very little material to work with.
My point is, that saturn was churning out the "Smart Car" of the 90's, and they did a better job. It got similar MPG's stock, cost about the same (given inflation), but the difference is, they made it a "full" sized car. I wish someone would have taken that platform and updated it.
This Elio, even if it turns out to be vaporware, is what I expect from the Smart Car and the Fiat 500. If it is going to be tiny, it needs to have incredible fuel economy. Until something like this actually comes out, I'll stick with my Buddy
- michelle_7728
- Member
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:16 am
- Location: Renton, WA
I just saw/read this.charlie55 wrote:You guys might want to give this a read.....
http://cleantechnica.com/2013/08/19/pau ... inancials/
Pretty harsh evaluation.....
I am not a numbers cruncher, nor do I know what it takes to get something like this off the ground, but I do know that for about the last decade the popular media here in America is no longer non-biased. They tend to strike down and flame anything that even faintly smells of thinking other than what ever is popular at the time.
So that being said, perhaps I am being very naive, but I'm choosing to believe that is the case here, and I'm keeping my hopes up that this little company can get it's feet under it and make a success story happen.
Past bikes: 08' Genuine Buddy 125, '07 Yamaha Majesty 400, '07 Piaggio MP3 250, '08 Piaggio MP3 500, '08 Aprilia Scarabeo 500
Current bikes: Two '09 Genuine Buddy 125's
Current bikes: Two '09 Genuine Buddy 125's
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
I have no problem with the numbers quoted nor with the fact that Elio can not
operate sucessfully with those figures. I DO have a problem with the SA attitude of the author of the report whose name I did not catch.At least I did
not see it as a byline for the article. I would love to see the Elio succeed but
faced with the fact that it is not an original basic concept and that other vehicles simular to it have not burned down the doors of the outo/motorcycle
barn I would have to say that the chances of it becoming a reality are slim to
none. That said, I will gladly eat my barbequed crow if it does.
operate sucessfully with those figures. I DO have a problem with the SA attitude of the author of the report whose name I did not catch.At least I did
not see it as a byline for the article. I would love to see the Elio succeed but
faced with the fact that it is not an original basic concept and that other vehicles simular to it have not burned down the doors of the outo/motorcycle
barn I would have to say that the chances of it becoming a reality are slim to
none. That said, I will gladly eat my barbequed crow if it does.
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
- michelle_7728
- Member
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:16 am
- Location: Renton, WA
LOL. I hear you. I hope you are wrong too, but only time will tell....Wolfhound wrote:I have no problem with the numbers quoted nor with the fact that Elio can not
operate sucessfully with those figures. I DO have a problem with the SA attitude of the author of the report whose name I did not catch.At least I did
not see it as a byline for the article. I would love to see the Elio succeed but
faced with the fact that it is not an original basic concept and that other vehicles simular to it have not burned down the doors of the outo/motorcycle
barn I would have to say that the chances of it becoming a reality are slim to
none. That said, I will gladly eat my barbequed crow if it does.
Past bikes: 08' Genuine Buddy 125, '07 Yamaha Majesty 400, '07 Piaggio MP3 250, '08 Piaggio MP3 500, '08 Aprilia Scarabeo 500
Current bikes: Two '09 Genuine Buddy 125's
Current bikes: Two '09 Genuine Buddy 125's
-
- Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 12:27 pm
- Location: Ball Ground, GA
Polaris is working on a new side by side seating trike. It is still in the design stage and has an open cockpit. Will be powered by a GM 2.4 L Echotec engine and a manual transmission. Info source: www.autorevolution.com
Now with a little change in design this could be an enclosed cockpit and with Polaris'money behind it could do what the Elio can't do. No info on performance statistics. If it will ever go into production remains to be seen.
The Can Am spyder would require a lot of design changes to compete in the
same market and as is only gets 30-35 mpg. Of course all of these concepts may just be beating a dead horse and earning a
Now with a little change in design this could be an enclosed cockpit and with Polaris'money behind it could do what the Elio can't do. No info on performance statistics. If it will ever go into production remains to be seen.
The Can Am spyder would require a lot of design changes to compete in the
same market and as is only gets 30-35 mpg. Of course all of these concepts may just be beating a dead horse and earning a
-
- In Time Out
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:54 pm
I think that is a pretty big deal for Elio and others like it. I would think the next big hurdle is dropping the motorcycle endorsement requirement. I think I saw them state on Elio's website that you can use the Elio to take the test (making it seem like it would be a piece of cake), but in VA, I am not sure I could pass the MC test in an Elio. The test seems way more condusive to a Buddy 125 than a huge 3 wheeled car.TVB wrote:I just saw a new item that there are now exemptions for vehicles like the Elio (which are being termed "autocycles") to helmet requirements in all but 5 states: Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, West Virginia, and Nebraska. They still require a motorcycle endorsement, however.
- CapnK
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 1:03 pm
- Location: Georgetown, SC
AAMOF, "i" don't own an Apple/Mac *anything*, Syd, although I've fixed plenty of 'em. "i" have been working in IT for over 20 years, and I'll work on/with Mac, Win, or *nix - using whatever it takes to get the job done best - *that* is what I am a fan of.Syd wrote:don't know why I continue to let this stuff bug me, but...CapnK wrote:What I would hate to see them do is to pull a Microsoft and rush an untested "beta" version out of the factory which then falls short of their stated goals of reliability, economy, and low cost...
MS, with their near-monopolistic market penetration, can afford to foist onto the public their technologically inferior, security-issue laden, improperly tested software which comes nowhere near the feature set they used to initially sell it; see WinME, Vista, and to a degree Win8, in their OS line. They have the resources to deal with the backlash, to absorb the initial blow of bad publicity until they can Service Pack "improvements" (AKA: what *should have been* in the RTM) out to the public.
iFanBoi much?
I also happened to have owned a Saturn SW2 for a number of years. It was not hard at all to get 35-40+ on the highway with that "old" technology.
Todd & walke2jd - Elio posted about the "5 states to go" for helmet exemption on their FB page today. Here's the linked article:
http://www.technologytell.com/in-car-te ... gislation/
A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way. - M. Twain